As well as its incredible biological richness, the Amazon plays an essential role in helping to control the entire planet’s atmospheric carbon levels. Its trees take up huge  amounts of carbon dioxide from the air, helping to offset
greenhouse gas emissions caused by human activity. The Amazon Basin is a vast carbon store, containing approximately 100 billion tonnes of carbon7
– over 10 times the global annual emissions from fossil fuel.

However, deforestation not only reduces the amount of carbon the forest can store, but also leads to emissions of greenhouse gases as cleared vegetation decays or is burnt to prepare the land for agriculture. It also leaves the remaining forest fragmented and vulnerable to further deforestation, commercial exploitation, invasive species and the impacts of climate change,
such as drought-induced fire. The more vulnerable a forest is to climate change, the greater the danger of its remaining carbon stocks being lost to the atmosphere.

Deforestation therefore increases the risk of runaway
climate change. As climate change impacts are felt, there are concerns
that the Amazon forest may reach a ‘tipping point’ in which it undergoes a rapid transition to savannah. The 2014 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessment reported that the probability of reaching this tipping point was increased by the combination of climate change and fragmentation acting together. Such a dramatic change would in turn lead to disastrous
losses both of biodiversity and of vital ecosystem services currently provided by the forest, such as provision of clean water and climate regulation.

Selective logging and fragmentation

Besides actual deforestation (clear-felling), selective logging is an important agent of forest fragmentation and degradation of the forest’s ecological integrity. It is well documented that the selective logging of mahogany trees
in intact primary Amazonian forest was a key driver of the fragmentation process until trade was strictly controlled in 2003 by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES),
which has substantially reduced the scale of the problem. Mahogany logging was the first step in a forest colonisation process involving slash-and-burn agriculture. Colonists advanced along roads built by logging companies,
deforesting areas alongside the roads and converting them to arable land and cattle ranches which broke up the continuity of the forest.

Even though the trade in mahogany has been curbed, selective logging remains a massive problem in the Amazon, with similar consequences. If left unchecked, forest fragmentation will ultimately lead to the disappearance of whole tracts of forest. One of the main  drivers of fragmentation today is the demand for highvalue species such as Ipê.

Ipê – the new mahogany
The group of species known as Ipê (Handroanthus spp. 13) have
been described as the ‘new mahogany’. Just like mahogany, they are highly prized, sought-after timber trees, and loggers are willing to go deep into intact primary forest in search of them.14 Ipê species form large canopy trees that display brilliant pink, yellow or white flowers in August and September
– distinguishing them from the rest of the canopy at that time.

They yield a valuable timber, known for its durability, strength and natural resistance to decay. Ipê growing in the Amazon has a low population density, with an average of one tree per 10 hectares.15 This means that large areas of forest need to be opened up to access these valuable trees.

Ironically, Ipê is best known as a tree planted in many Brazilian cities. Ipê is an integral part of Brazilian indigenous history, with various species being used by indigenous peoples for their hunting bows. Ipê bark is widely reputed to have medicinal properties, and is used by the traditional and herbal medicine
industries as a remedy for cancer, ulcers, arthritis and fungal infections, among others. Ipê wood (also referred to as Brazilian Walnut or Lapacho) is
now the construction industry’s top choice for commercial and residential decking, and is often portrayed as a green option as it does not require weatherproofing or pesticidal treatment with toxic chemicals. In the DIY market, Ipê is sold as decking and flooring. In the United States, Ipê has been used for many piers, boardwalks and bridges in New Jersey, California,
New York (including the Brooklyn Bridge) and elsewhere.

In Europe Ipê has been used for decking at iconic sites including
the World Trade Centre in Geneva, the Antwerp Law Courts
in Belgium and the National Library in Paris (Bibliothèque François Mitterrand). In Europe Ipê has been used for decking at iconic sites including Geneva’s World Trade Centre, the Antwerp Law Courts (Gerechtsgebouw Antwerpen) and Paris’ National Library (Bibliothèque François Mitterrand). In Brazil,
Ipê timber is found in many cities, and was recently used for flooring in the library of the Presidential Palace.

Even leaving aside the impact of illegal logging, Ipê species are at risk of serious over-harvesting. Logging companies are permitted to fell 90% of commercial-sized adults, with a second cut permitted after 35 years. However, it has been estimated that after an initial 90% felling it would take at least 60 years for commercial volumes of one species (H. impetiginosus) to
recover to pre-harvest levels. Ipê is the most valuable Brazilian tropical timber, and among the most expensive globally. While the volumes of Ipê
harvested and exported have declined in recent years, the price continues to increase – driving loggers ever deeper into the forest in search of it.

Timber from the Brazilian Amazon

Under pressure from vested interests, the Brazilian government has recently relaxed rules on deforestation and has limited the capacity of the federal environmental agencies that enforce those rules. Accordingly, while annual deforestation rates in the Brazilian Amazon had fallen in recent years, between August 2012 and July 2013 deforestation actually increased by 28% compared with the previous year.

The states with the largest increase in deforestation by area,
Mato Grosso and Pará, also have the highest levels of illegal  logging. Pará state is the largest timber producer and exporter in the Brazilian Amazon,21 yet between August 2011 and July 2012 an estimated 78% of logging (by area) in the state was illegal.22 Similar analysis of Mato Grosso, the second-largest
producer and exporter,23 shows that over the same period 54% of the total logged area was logged illegally.

This illegal logging is fuelled by a lack of governance in public areas, indigenous lands and other protected and community lands; a lack of inspection and enforcement capacity on the part of local authorities; high demand for timber, including high-value species; and illegal deforestation for agriculture (with illegal timber as a by-product). Governance of the timber sector in the Brazilian Amazon is weak and open to exploitation. Studies have demonstrated vast discrepancies between volumes of timber harvested and
the quantities actually authorised. The national system for approval of forest management plans is structurally flawed, as is the chain-of-custody system, leading to systemic crime in the logging sector. Large amounts of illegal timber enter national and international timber markets after being laundered using genuine documents obtained by fraudulent means (see The 5 ways to launder illegal timber, p11).

According to the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis – IBAMA), the federal environmental agency responsible (alongside state environmental secretariats) for monitoring and inspecting
the Amazon timber industry, in Maranhão and Pará states alone almost 500,000m³ of timber had fraudulent documents in 2013 – enough to fill 14,000 trucks.25 Given the magnitude of the fraud and corruption, there is no question that official documents issued in Brazil to certify the legality of timber are largely unreliable and cannot alone be considered as evidence of legality.

A different path is necessary
The timber industry in the Brazilian Amazon is currently a key driver of forest degradation and a catalyst for deforestation. Logging, particularly for valuable timber species including Ipê, is the first phase in the deforestation cycle, drives colonisation of once remote intact forest areas, and is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. In addition to environmental damage and biodiversity loss, it also leads to social conflict when timber is taken from public or indigenous lands and other conservation areas without community
knowledge or in defiance of community wishes. Furthermore, illegal logging is characterised by appalling working conditions, often using slave labour, and is accompanied by violence, death threats and sometimes even assassinations
of those who oppose t.

A different way of approaching the forest and those whose livelihoods depend on forest products is not only possible, but absolutely necessary. Investment and capacity building need to be focused on giving communities the skills to undertake quality community forest management. The Brazilian government
must strengthen the regulation of timber harvesting, and the enforcement of regulations. Surveillance, monitoring and enforcement systems should be transparent and able to operate in real time so that communities, civil society and other stakeholders can be sure that those harvesting timber are complying with rigorous government regulations. Such changes
will give those purchasing Amazon timber greater reassurance that it is not linked to forest destruction and social conflict.

Protecting the Amazon and creating a sustainable and fair development plan for the region could generate opportunities for forest-dependent peoples, at the same time as preserving the region’s rich biodiversity and safeguarding its important role in the fight against climate cha.

Regulation of timber management and harvesting

Forest timber may be legally harvested from either private or public land (including Federal and state protected areas) with the correct authorisation. Much harvesting on public land takes place in areas managed by communities living in Federal settlements. Harvesting on private land is subject to regulations that permit clear-felling of up to 20% of an estate and selective logging of much of the remainder.

In Pará and Mato Grosso, the oversight of timber harvesting is exercised by the SEMA through the Integrated System for Environmental Monitoring and Licensing (Sistema Integrado de Monitoramento e Licenciamento Ambiental – SIMLAM), a computerised system by means of which estates are
registered and monitored, and licences issued for their activities, including logging. The PMFS approval process is conducted via SIMLAM.

A PMFS is obligatory for landowners who wish to harvest timber beyond the 20% of an estate that is allowed to be completely deforested. It is typically drawn up for the SEMA’s approval by an independent forest engineer contracted by the landowner or the company that is to carry out logging on
the landowner’s behalf, and once approved is valid for up to five years. It specifies an Area of Forest Management (Área de Manejo Florestal – AMF) within the property, which may amount to as much as 80%, or more if the owner agrees not to clear-cut the 20% to which he or she is entitled.

The AMF may be subdivided into Annual Production Units (Unidades de Produção Annual – UPA), depending on the landowner or operator’s capacity to harvest the area over the space of one year. Any environmentally sensitive Permanent Preservation Areas (Áreas de Preservação Permanente – APP)
within each UPA must be excluded from logging – the remaining area to be logged is termed the Forest Management Unit (Unidade de Manejo Florestal –
UMF). Each UPA is in turn divided into Work Units (Unidades de Trabalho – UT), by which the locations of individual trees are identified.

To harvest timber, the landowner/operator must have a Logging Authorisation (Autorização de Exploração Florestal – AUTEF), issued by the SEMA via SIMLAM and valid for one year, with renewal possible for another year. This document generates credits for timber transactions within the Sisflora chain of custody system (see below). There must be an AUTEF associated with all
timber sold or transported. For each UPA, the person or company responsible for the management plan must present an Annual Operation Plan (Plano
Operacional Anual – POA), including a forest inventory specifying
what will be harvested over that year (number of trees, their location and species, and the estimated cubic metres of timber in each tree).3
If it approves the POA, the SEMA issues an AUTEF.

In the Amazon, harvesting is currently limited to 30m3
of timber (equivalent to two to five trees, depending on species and size)
per hectare every 35 years. Illegal harvesting of timber In spite of this regulatory system, however, the Amazon is awash with illegal timber. Timber may be illegal because it comes from land on a private estate that has been clear-felled without a deforestation authorisation, or logged without an AUTEF; because it has been harvested in excess of the maximum authorised for a given area; or because it has been taken without permission from public land, or even from areas protected for wildlife or indigenous peoples and other communities. Between 2007 and 2012, unauthorised logging in Pará state alone covered 717,000ha, 79% of the total logging (905,000ha).


The Amazon and the climate

As well as its incredible biological richness, the Amazon plays an essential role in helping to control the entire planet’s atmospheric carbon levels. Its trees take up huge  amounts […]

The Amazon’s silent crisis THE EU MARKET AND THE EUTR

Europe is a key market for tropical timber exports from the Brazilian Amazon, with one-third of all  timber exported from the region going to EU countries. In 2013, EU […]

Proin dui sodales imperdi sit

Pellentesque et lacus pretium tincidunt. Pellentesque at metus. Donec nisl a nisl. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in nulla orci ut leo nec cursus consequat, orci ut

Vestibulum commodo volutpat laoreet

Nunc felis. Curabitur ac ipsum. Pellentesque nibh ultricies est. Maecenas consequat, augue a venenatis risus. Ut id mollis vel, lacinia quam. Praesent blandit malesuada. Suspendisse commodo